000 | 03557cam a22002774a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 15671041 | ||
003 | IIITD | ||
005 | 20170725091951.0 | ||
008 | 090324s2010 mau b 001 0 eng | ||
010 | _a 2009012426 | ||
020 | _a9780262517249 | ||
040 |
_aDLC _cDLC _dDLC |
||
050 | 0 | 0 |
_aBJ1461 _b.B25 2010 |
082 | 0 | 0 |
_a123.5 _222 _bBAL-F |
100 | 1 | _aBalaguer, Mark | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aFree will as an open scientific problem _cMark Balaguer. |
260 |
_aCambridge, MA : _bMIT Press, _c©2010. |
||
300 |
_aviii, 202 p. ; _c24 cm. |
||
500 | _a"A Bradford book." | ||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [185]-194) and index. | ||
505 | 0 | _aIntroduction -- Formulating the problem of free will -- The old formulation of the problem of free will -- Compatibilism and the rejection of an intermediate formulation of the problem of free will -- The final (or a new-and-improved) formulation of the problem of free will -- Some remarks on libertarianism -- Synopsis of the book -- Why the compatibilism issue and the conceptual-analysis issue are metaphysically irrelevant -- What determines whether an answer to the what-is-free-will question is correct -- Why the what-is-free-will question is irrelevant to the do-we-have-free-will -- Question, assuming the OL view is correct -- Why the what-is-free-will question is irrelevant to the do-we-have-free-will -- Question, even if the OL view isn't correct -- The which-kinds-of-freedom-do-we-have question -- The coherence question -- The moral responsibility question (and the issue of what's worth wanting) -- Generalizing the argument -- Why the compatibilism question reduces to the what-is-free-will question -- Where we stand and where we're going next -- An aside : some remarks on the what-is-free-will question, the compatibilism question, and the moral responsibility question -- The what-is-free-will question and the compatibilism question -- The moral responsibility question -- Why the libertarian question reduces to the issue of indeterminacy -- Preliminaries -- Torn decisions -- Indeterminacy -- Appropriate non-randomness -- The argument -- If our torn decisions are undetermined, then we author and control them -- The argument from token-token identity -- The argument from phenomenology -- Objections -- Why TDW-indeterminism increases or procures authorship and control -- Why this sort of L-freedom is worth wanting -- If our torn decisions are undetermined, then they are sufficiently rational to be L-free -- Plural authorship, control, and rationality non-torn decisions -- Where we stand -- Why there are no good arguments for or against determinism (or any other thesis that would establish or refute libertarianism)? -- An a priori argument for determinism (and, hence, against TDW-indeterminism) -- An a priori argument for libertarianism (and, hence, in favor of TDW-ndeterminism) -- Empirical arguments -- Arguments for universal determinism -- Arguments for macro-level determinism or virtual macro-level determinism -- Arguments for neural determinism or virtual neural determinism -- Arguments for torn-decision determinism, or for virtual torn-decision -- Determinism or against TDW-indeterminism -- The argument from Tegmark's work -- The argument from Libet's work -- Arguments from psychology -- Where we stand. | |
650 | 0 | _aFree will and determinism. | |
906 |
_a7 _bcbc _corignew _d1 _eecip _f20 _gy-gencatlg |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cBK |
||
999 |
_c9803 _d9803 |